掃一掃
關(guān)注中圖網(wǎng)
官方微博
外國文學研究文庫敘事開端:理論與實踐/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 版權(quán)信息
- ISBN：9787521320565
- 條形碼：9787521320565 ; 978-7-5213-2056-5
- 裝幀：一般膠版紙
- 冊數(shù)：暫無
- 重量：暫無
- 所屬分類：>
外國文學研究文庫敘事開端:理論與實踐/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 本書特色
適讀人群 ：學生,教師,一般讀者《敘事開端：理論與實踐》是“外國文學研究文庫”系列第三輯的一本。該系列旨在將國外的文學學界的學術(shù)成果及時引進和介紹給我國外國文學學者、學生及愛好者，反映外國文學研究領(lǐng)域在世界范圍的發(fā)展趨勢與前沿探索。 “外國文學研究文庫”英文書以原版的形式、非英文書以譯本的形式出版，并輔之以國內(nèi)這一領(lǐng)域的資深學者撰寫的導讀，幫助讀者把握作品的脈絡(luò)，掌握其思想要點，更全面、更深入地理解作品要義。
外國文學研究文庫敘事開端:理論與實踐/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 內(nèi)容簡介
開端、副文本與文化原型分別指什么？ 敘事文學如何開端？ 開端與結(jié)尾又是什么關(guān)系？ …… 《敘事開端：理論與實踐/外國文學研究文庫·第三輯》既論述了敘事作品開端的一般規(guī)律，又列舉其體現(xiàn)在具體作品中的特殊表現(xiàn)，從開端的形式美學到隱含其中的文化歷史意蘊，為讀者呈現(xiàn)了關(guān)于開端的新研究成果。
外國文學研究文庫敘事開端:理論與實踐/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 目錄
Editor's Preface
Acknowledgments
Introduction Narrative Beginnings
Part One: Origins, Paratexts,and Prototypes
1. To Begin with the Beginning Birth, Origin,and Narrative Inception
2. Before the Beginning Nabokov and the Rhetoric of the Preface
3. Stories, Wars, and Emotions The Absoluteness of Narrative Beginnings
4. September 1939 Beginnings, Historical Narrative, and the Outbreak of World War Ⅱ
Part Two:Beginnings in Narrative Literature
5.“The More I Write, the More I Shall Have to Write”The Many Beginnings of Tristram Shandy
6. Virginia Woolf and Beginning's Ragged Edge
7.A Theory of Narrative Beginnings and the Beginnings of “The Dead”and Molloy
8. Heartbreak Tango Manuel Puig's Counter-Archive
9. Lost Beginnings in Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children
10. Recessive Origins in Julia Alvarez's Garcia Girls A Feminist Exploration of Narrative Beginnings
11. Curtain Up？ Disrupted, Disguised, and Delayed Beginnings in Theater and Drama
12. Where to Begin？ Multiple Narrative Paths in Web Fiction
Part Three:Beginnings and/as Endings
13. The Beginning of Beloved A Rhetorical Approach
14. Connecting Links Beginnings and Endings
15."Mr.Betwixt-and-Between”The Politics of Narrative Indeterminacy in Stevenson's Kidnapped and David Balfour
16. Maculate Reconceptions
Further Reading on Narrative Beginnings
Contributors
Index
展開全部
外國文學研究文庫敘事開端:理論與實踐/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 節(jié)選
《敘事開端：理論與實踐/外國文學研究文庫·第三輯》： This selection then combines with our tendency to segment and structure causes in terms of malevolent or benevolent intentions， with some bias toward malevolent categorization. One result is the common specification of narrative beginnings in terms of malevolent actions. We find this to some degree in the standard beginnings for all three cross-cultural narrative prototypes： romantic， heroic， and sacrificial tragicomic.12 For example， in the standard romantic plot， the lovers are initially separated by an interfering parent. For our purposes， the most important of these three prototypes is the heroic， because our employment of wars is precisely an employment in terms of the heroic prototype. That prototype manifests the malevolent initiating moment most starkly. Moreover， it synthesizes our tendency to view causality as dispositional （i.e.， to understand it in terms of benevolence or malevolence） with our parallel tendency to categorize human agents into in-groups and out-groups. Specifically， it sets out a malevolent attack by an out-group-usually an invasion by a foreign power-as the absolute and singular origin of the central narrative conflict. Beyond these matters， which bear directly on narrative beginnings， our cognitive dispositions have other consequences for our （narrative） understanding of and response to war as well. One result is that we tend to experience our own emotionally guided response to the "initiating event" as compelled by the event， thus not morally blameworthy. This is particularly true when we have no attentional focus on the harmful consequences of our acts （e.g.， enemy casualties that would trigger empathy by way of mirror neurons）. In contrast， we tend to see the malevolent actions of the out-group as chosen. They are not caused by prior events， but rather derive from group properties. Thus their actions are not only immoral in themselves but reveal an underlying immorality of shared character （racial， cultural， religious， national， or whatever）. A second result is that arguments against absolute and singular origins for conflict strike us as similar to the arguments of out-groups. Specifically， we tend to categorize such arguments as positing a different origin for conflict rather than as disputing origins per se. Because of the cognitive and affective constraints on our spontaneous causal understandings， we readily assimilate such arguments to justifications for the out-group actions. Simplifying somewhat， we might say that our spontaneous causal attributions give us two obvious alternatives our own version of causal attribution and a parallel version offered by the out-group. If these are the two options， then any argument that is not of the former sort would seem to be of the latter sort. Of course， in many cases， attacks on antiwar arguments are duplicitous. Politicians know perfectly well that， for example， antiwar protestors are not supporters of Saddam Hussein. However， the point is that the objective illogic of their objections to protestors can be broadly persuasive due to our cognitive propensities. The preceding point is enhanced by a final consequence of human emotion； specifically， insofar as they involve strong emotions， our spontaneous attributions of causality may remain at least partially impervious to our knowledge about actual causal relations. In other words， our emotion system may continue to spontaneously project a single， absolute， malevolent origin to conflict， even when higher cortical systems have inferred that this is not the case. Again， this results from two complementary factors. First， our emotional responses may usurp working memory， thus the very inferential processes that should inhibit our spontaneous causal attributions. Second， our lack of emotional involvement with alternative analyses （e.g.， our lack of emotional involvement with the projected causal agents， thus the out-group） means that these alternative analyses receive no further attentional focus or elaboration and thus are unlikely to engage inhibitory processes. ……
外國文學研究文庫敘事開端:理論與實踐/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 作者簡介
作者，布賴恩·理查森（Brian Richardson）是美國馬里蘭大學的英文教授，非自然敘事研究的奠基人，撰寫和編著《非自然聲音：現(xiàn)當代小說中的極端敘事》等多部作品。 主編簡介 金莉：北京外國語大學教授、博導，文學博士。研究領(lǐng)域為美國小說與美國女性文學。目前擔任北外王佐良外國文學高等研究院院長和《外國文學》雜志主編。主要著作包括《文學女性與女性文學》《20世紀美國女性小說研究》《當代美國女權(quán)文學批評家研究》，并發(fā)表論文多篇。
書友推薦
- >
回憶愛瑪儂
- >
朝聞道
- >
姑媽的寶刀
- >
羅庸西南聯(lián)大授課錄
- >
人文閱讀與收藏·良友文學叢書:一天的工作
- >
李白與唐代文化
- >
苦雨齋序跋文-周作人自編集
- >
我與地壇
本類暢銷
